Supreme Court of Iowa· 2/14/2001
State v. Daly
Citations
- 623 N.W.2d 799
- 2001 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 28
- 2001 WL 125056
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that it was error for trial court not to engage in probative value verses prejudice balancing process under Iowa Rule of Evidence 609 regarding impeachment of criminal defendant for prior conviction
- holding that it was error for trial court not to engage in probative value verses prejudice balancing process under Iowa Rule of Evidence 609 regarding impeachment of criminal defendant for prior conviction
- holding that defendant may introduce preemptively evidence of criminal convictions without waiver of right to assert error on appeal; under Iowa law, however, \the rule of waiver is contrary to established precedent\
- holding that defendant may introduce preemptively evidence of criminal convictions without waiver of right to assert error on appeal; under Iowa law, however, “the rule of waiver is contrary to established precedent”
- holding that the waiver was contrary to established precedent in Iowa
- holding that an exception to the general rule applied when counsel asked the court whether its ruling was the final order of the court and the court responded, “yes”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Larson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ThangWashington Supreme Court· 2002-03-07· cited 296×
- State v. RodriquezSupreme Court of Iowa· 2001-11-15· cited 177×
- State v. SullivanSupreme Court of Iowa· 2004-04-07· cited 169×
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Iowa· 2005-05-06· cited 76×
- State v. SchaerSupreme Court of Iowa· 2008-11-21· cited 62×
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Iowa· 2009-05-01· cited 43×
- Quad City Bank & Trust v. Jim Kircher & Associates, P.C.Supreme Court of Iowa· 2011-09-23· cited 41×
- State of Iowa v. Raymond Carl RedmondSupreme Court of Iowa· 2011-09-09· cited 33×
- State of Iowa v. Justin Robert DerbySupreme Court of Iowa· 2011-06-03· cited 31×
- Pineda v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2004-05-04· cited 24×
- State of Iowa v. Wendell Karl HarringtonSupreme Court of Iowa· 2011-06-03· cited 24×
- Cure v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-08-16· cited 23×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-02-24· cited 20×
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa· 2005-01-07· cited 19×
- State v. AllenNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2013-12-16· cited 16×
- McCabe v. MacAulayN.D. Iowa· 2006-09-01· cited 6×
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Iowa· 2005-10-07· cited 3×
- State v. AllenNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2014-02-12· cited 1×
- State of Iowa v. Anthony John MercyCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2016-08-17
- Dubuque Injection Service Company, plaintiff/counterclaim defendant-appellant/cross-appellee v. Steven J. Kress, defendant/counterclaim plaintiff-appellee/cross-appellant. ------------------------------------------------------ Dubuque Injection Service Company v. Bk Diesel Service, Inc. defendant/cross-appellant.Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2017-06-21
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ohler v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2000-05-22· cited 666×
- Morris W. Gordon v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1967-10-27· cited 575×
- State v. LigginsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1994-11-23· cited 107×
- State v. TangieSupreme Court of Iowa· 2000-09-07· cited 103×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1975-05-21· cited 56×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa· 1978-11-22· cited 51×
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-24· cited 31×
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Iowa· 1982-08-25· cited 14×
- State v. AxiotisSupreme Court of Iowa· 1997-10-22· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.