State v. Schaer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding a victim’s statements identifying her attacker to her stepsister and treatment providers were nontestimonial
• holding defendant did not establish Strickland prejudice where the challenged testimony was merely cumulative and the prosecutor’s case was strong
• concluding a victim’s statements identifying her attacker to her stepsister and treatment providers were nontestimonial
• finding no prejudice from hearsay when it was 19 cumulative of other properly admitted testimony
• finding no prejudice from hearsay when it was 19 cumulative of other properly admitted testimony
• noting the lack of relationship between medical personnel and police indicated the questioning was not “a substitute for police interrogation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).