Skip to main content
N.D. Iowa· 9/1/2006

McCabe v. MacAulay

Citations

  • 450 F. Supp. 2d 928
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63822
  • 2006 WL 2549070

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • when the right has not been clearly established by the Supreme Court or the circuit in which the district court sits and other circuits are split on the issue, it cannot be said that the defendant has violated a clearly established right
  • including state constitutional claims within the exclusivity provision
  • denying Rule 56(f) motion in part

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reade

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

93 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.