Skip to main content
· 6/29/1981

State v. Bradfield

Citations

  • 630 P.2d 494
  • 29 Wash. App. 679
  • 1981 Wash. App. LEXIS 2484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where defendant toyed with police by telling only facts he wanted them to hear, he cannot rely upon Miranda and his \nonstatements\ were properly admitted
  • “Absent some showing of actual prejudice, we will not interfere with the trial court’s exercise of discretion in denying sanctions pursuant to CrR 4.7(h)(7)(i).”
  • “Absent some showing of actual prejudice, we will not interfere with the trial court’s exercise of discretion in denying sanctions pursuant to CrR 4.7(h)(7)(i).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Corbett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.