Court of Appeals of Washington· 3/24/2009
State v. Brooks
Citations
- 203 P.3d 397
- 149 Wash. App. 373
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial court did not abuse its discretion by not considering alternatives that were not presented to it
- noting that the State' s delay in providing discovery supported the finding of actual prejudice to the defendant
- prejudice can be established if the defendant is forced to choose between right to speedy trial and going to trial unprepared
- prejudice can be established if the defendant is forced to choose between right to speedy trial and going to trial unprepared
- the State did not provide any discovery, including names and addresses of witnesses and any witness statements, failed to make the police file available to the defense, and continued to provide stacks of new discovery on the mornings of hearings
- the State did not provide any discovery, including names and addresses of witnesses and any witness statements, failed to make the police file available to the defense, and continued to provide stacks of new discovery on the mornings of hearings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bridgewater
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BarryCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-12-04· cited 82×
- State v. HargettSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-06-14· cited 9×
- State Of Washington, V. Adam B. MyersCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2023-08-07· cited 5×
- State Of Washington v. Ascencion Salgado-mendozaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-05-24· cited 3×
- State Of Washington v. Darin Richard BarryCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-12-04
- State v. Salgado-MendozaWashington Supreme Court· 2017-10-12
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 4,383×
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court· 1949-02-14· cited 1,180×
- Walker v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1986-12-01· cited 387×
- State v. Kwan Fai MakWashington Supreme Court· 1986-04-24· cited 348×
- State v. BlackwellWashington Supreme Court· 1993-02-18· cited 260×
- State v. MichielliWashington Supreme Court· 1997-05-29· cited 257×
- State v. HutchinsonWashington Supreme Court· 1998-07-30· cited 187×
- State v. DaileyWashington Supreme Court· 1980-05-01· cited 99×
- State v. PriceWashington Supreme Court· 1980-12-11· cited 88×
- State v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court· 2003-03-13· cited 70×
- State v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-12-10· cited 56×
- State v. MarksWashington Supreme Court· 1990-07-25· cited 34×
- State v. KoerberCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-12-30· cited 30×
- Davis v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Supreme Court· 1999-02-22· cited 22×
- State v. StephansCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-05-05· cited 18×
- State v. ChichesterCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-10-29· cited 17×
- State v. KoerberCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-02-24· cited 7×
- State v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-12-05· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.