Skip to main content

State v. Brooks

Citations

  • 203 P.3d 397
  • 149 Wash. App. 373

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court did not abuse its discretion by not considering alternatives that were not presented to it
  • noting that the State' s delay in providing discovery supported the finding of actual prejudice to the defendant
  • prejudice can be established if the defendant is forced to choose between right to speedy trial and going to trial unprepared
  • prejudice can be established if the defendant is forced to choose between right to speedy trial and going to trial unprepared
  • the State did not provide any discovery, including names and addresses of witnesses and any witness statements, failed to make the police file available to the defense, and continued to provide stacks of new discovery on the mornings of hearings
  • the State did not provide any discovery, including names and addresses of witnesses and any witness statements, failed to make the police file available to the defense, and continued to provide stacks of new discovery on the mornings of hearings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bridgewater

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.