Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1/5/2000
State v. Cunningham
Citations
- 995 P.2d 561
- 164 Or. App. 680
- 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 52
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that evidence of an STD is tantamount to evidence of past sexual behavior under Oregon Rule of Evidence 412 because STDs generally occur as the result of sexual intercourse or sexual contact
- noting “the legal proposition that a proponent of a request to the court has the burden of demonstrating prima facie grounds for the relief requested”
- determining whether trial court's failure to hold competency hearing had little likelihood of affecting jury's verdict
- Evidence of a sexually transmitted disease is not admissible because if the disease is sexually transmitted, presence of the disease raises past sexual behavior
- Evidence of a sexually transmitted disease is not admissible because if the disease is sexually transmitted, presence of the disease raises past sexual behavior
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmonds, Deits, Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Fells v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2005-04-21· cited 28×
- Kahn v. Pony Express Courier Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-03-14· cited 27×
- State v. Ricardo Ozuna, Jr.Idaho Court of Appeals· 2013-10-07· cited 13×
- State v. HayneCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-08-15· cited 6×
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-05-09· cited 5×
- State v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-03-21· cited 2×
- State v. HerimanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-03-13· cited 2×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-04-18· cited 3,197×
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1966-03-21· cited 3,039×
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1975-02-19· cited 2,695×
- Michigan v. LucasSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 513×
- Luther K. Barnett, Jr. v. Steve HargettTenth Circuit· 1999-04-16· cited 305×
- Shields v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court· 1977-01-27· cited 78×
- State v. MontezOregon Supreme Court· 1996-11-21· cited 61×
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-07-05· cited 33×
- York v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-03-24· cited 31×
- State v. LajoieOregon Supreme Court· 1993-04-15· cited 24×
- State v. ArndtCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1970-02-19· cited 10×
- State v. GillilandCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-09-13· cited 9×
- State v. BassCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-07-11· cited 8×
- Beady v. CallowayCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1972-09-18· cited 5×
- State v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-06-06· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.