State v. Ricardo Ozuna, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \evidence related to whether a victim had an STD or whether the defendant thought the victim had an STD at the time of an alleged sex crime is evidence of a victim's past sexual behavior\
• evidence related to the victim’s STD and the defendant’s lack of the STD was properly excluded and the exclusion did not violate the defendant’s constitutional right to present a defense
• evidence related to the victim's STD and the defendant's lack of the STD was properly excluded and the exclusion did not violate the defendant's constitutional right to present a defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).