Skip to main content
· 3/24/1999

York v. Bailey

Citations

  • 976 P.2d 1181
  • 159 Or. App. 341
  • 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 422

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating standard of review for denial of a motion for directed verdict
  • appealing party bears burden to designate record sufficient to demonstrate prejudicial error
  • “[A]n order denying summary judgment is not reviewable following a full trial on the merits, unless the motion rests on ‘purely legal contentions’ that do not require the establishment of any predicate facts.”
  • appellant must designate a sufficient record to demonstrate that the trial court committed error
  • purely legal contentions do not require the establishment of any predicate facts
  • “[T]he party seeking a modification or reversal on the basis of the asserted error will have a burden to ensure that the appellate record permits the court to make the determination necessary to award the relief the party seeks.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Deits, Linder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.