Court of Appeals of Oregon· 8/30/2017

State v. Crum

Citations

287 Or. App. 541
403 P.3d 405
2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 1032

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that the right to confront witnesses under the state and federal constitutions “includes the right to question a witness about circumstances from which a jury could reasonably infer that the witness has a motive to testify in a certain manner” (internal quotation marks omitted)
evidence of police department’s use-of-force policies was relevant to whether officer involved in shooting had an interest in presenting facts in a certain way
exclusion of evidence of offi- cer’s bias was not harmless when the case hinged on the outcome of a dispute over whether the defendant raised a rifle during the confrontation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Dehoog, Duncan, Dévore, Egan, Garrett, Hadlock, James, Lagesen, Ortega, Sercombe, Shorr, Tempore, Tookey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.