West Virginia Supreme Court· 2/6/1979

State v. Frazier

Citations

252 S.E.2d 39
162 W. Va. 602
1979 W. Va. LEXIS 339

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

observing in passing that Miranda \may apply to the defendant's taking a polygraph test.\
observing in passing that Miranda “may apply to the defendant’s taking a polygraph test.”
discussing the impropriety of a testifying police officer remaining in the grand jury room after he has finished testifying and participating in the grand jury proceedings by questioning other grand jury witnesses
“Polygraph test results are not admissible in evidence in a criminal trial in this State.”
no objective factors were given or special familiarity shown other than witness' testimony that his past experience in smoking marijuana enabled him to identify cigarettes defendant gave him as containing marijuana
no objective factors were given or special familiarity shown other than witness’ testimony that his past experience in smoking marijuana enabled him to identify cigarettes defendant gave him as containing marijuana

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

97 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

69 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.