Skip to main content

People v. Baynes

Citations

  • 430 N.E.2d 1070
  • 88 Ill. 2d 225
  • 58 Ill. Dec. 819
  • 1981 Ill. LEXIS 407

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering and relying upon various scientific commentaries to support the conclusion that polygraph tests are inadmissible
  • finding error in the introduction at trial of the results of a polygraph examination taken by a criminal defendant, even though the prosecution agreed to the admission of the evidence
  • reversing despite the fact that the evidence was not closely balanced because stipulation to polygraph evidence by the parties impinged on the integrity of the judicial process
  • relying upon decisions from other jurisdictions in determining whether polygraph evidence is admissible
  • relying upon decisions from other jurisdictions in determining whether polygraph evidence is admissible
  • there is a significant risk that the jury will regard quasi-scientific but unreliable polygraph evidence as conclusive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

174 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Baynes

10 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.