Pereira v. State Bd. of Educ.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[u]nder such circumstances, the time limitation is a substantive and jurisdictional prerequisite, which may be raised . . . at Speer v. Skaats any time, even by the court sua sponte” (internal quota- tion marks omitted)
• use of negative terminology sug- gested that statutory provision was mandatory
• ‘‘[i]t is well established that [during trial] a party that fails to object timely to the introduction of evidence . . . is deemed to have waived such objection . . . and may not subsequently resurrect it’’ (internal quota- tion marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).