Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2/17/1976
State v. O'NEAL
Citations
- 545 P.2d 910
- 24 Or. App. 423
- 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 2346
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that Oregon has adopted “the general rule that the sentencing authority of a court exists solely by virtue of a statutory grant of power and therefore cannot be exercised in any manner not specifi- cally authorized”
- noting that Oregon has adopted “the general rule that the sentencing authority of a court exists solely by virtue of a statutory grant of power and therefore cannot be exercised in any manner not specifically authorized”
- noting that Oregon has adopted “the general rule that the sentencing authority of a court exists solely by virtue of a statutory grant of power and therefore cannot be exercised in any manner not specifically authorized” (citing State v. Cotton, 240 Or 252, 400 P2d 1022 (1965)
- no tolling of the probationary period by the consequences of defendant’s con- duct since such an extension would need to be specifically authorized by statute
- “[A] court is without authority to revoke probation for a crime committed during the probationary period when revocation proceedings have not been initiated before the probationary period has expired.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwab, Foley, Fort
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Smith v. CookUtah Supreme Court· 1990-11-29· cited 44×
- State v. BraughtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-03-28· cited 30×
- People v. GoreSupreme Court of Colorado· 1989-05-30· cited 17×
- State v. BerglundCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-05-12· cited 11×
- State v. StuveCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-02-12· cited 7×
- State v. VanlieuCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-07-25· cited 7×
- Galaktionoff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1987-03-06· cited 5×
- State v. HultmanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-11-16· cited 4×
- State v. GranberryCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-12-18· cited 4×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-09-27· cited 2×
- State v. LaCrossCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-06-21
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.