Supreme Court· 6/15/1953
Stein v. New York
Citations
- 346 U.S. 156
- 73 S. Ct. 1077
- 97 L. Ed. 2d 1522
- 1953 U.S. LEXIS 1901
- 97 L. Ed. 1522
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that use of physical force by interrogators creates heavy presumption, if not per se rule, that there has been a violation of due process
- noting that per se involuntariness rule applies when an interrogation is accompanied by physical violence
- noting “tendency of the innocent, as well as the guilty, to risk remote results of a false confession rather than suffer immediate pain ... ”
- asking jurors whether the value of stolen property was more or less than $100
- When physical violence is present, “there is no need to weigh or measure its effects on the will of the individual victim.”
- no criminal confession is ever voluntary in sense that a defendant wants to make it
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jackson, Douglas, Frankfurter, Court'S, Black
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
577 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 5,113×
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 4,617×
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
- California v. GreenSupreme Court· 1970-06-23· cited 3,363×
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 1,932×
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court· 1972-01-12· cited 1,930×
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,740×
- Estes v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 1,725×
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1961-06-19· cited 1,662×
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1965-01-18· cited 1,449×
- Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court· 1961-03-20· cited 1,412×
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1963-05-27· cited 1,403×
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court· 1965-01-25· cited 1,309×
- Rideau v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1963-06-03· cited 1,211×
Cites
58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1932-11-07· cited 4,979×
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1934-01-08· cited 2,822×
- In Re OliverSupreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 2,065×
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-06-07· cited 2,030×
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1945-05-07· cited 2,023×
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court· 1951-04-30· cited 1,907×
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court· 1935-01-21· cited 1,837×
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 1949-06-27· cited 1,554×
- Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1942-02-02· cited 1,400×
- Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1897-12-13· cited 1,397×
- Haley v. OhioSupreme Court· 1948-01-19· cited 1,069×
- Brown v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1936-02-17· cited 960×
- Shaughnessy v. United States Ex Rel. MezeiSupreme Court· 1953-03-16· cited 871×
- Chambers v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1940-02-12· cited 844×
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1912-06-10· cited 844×
- Watts v. IndianaSupreme Court· 1949-06-27· cited 831×
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court· 1915-06-14· cited 734×
- Carlson v. LandonSupreme Court· 1952-03-10· cited 717×
- Malinski v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1945-03-26· cited 711×
- Ashcraft v. TennesseeSupreme Court· 1944-05-01· cited 693×
Other cases named Stein v. New York
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.