Hawaii Supreme Court· 8/30/2001

State v. Jones

Citations

29 P.3d 351
96 Haw. 161

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the alternative theories of “absence of consent” and “ineffective consent” constitute “alternative means of proving the attendant circumstance element of a single crime”
holding that unanimity by the jury is not required, “provided that there is no reasonable possibility that the jury’s verdict was based on an alternative unsupported by sufficient evidence”
concluding that retrial is not barred by the double jeopardy clause where the reviewing court overturns a case due to trial error and sufficient evidence of guilt was established at trial
determining that there was independent legally sufficient evidence to establish guilt, so as not to bar retrial based on double jeopardy principles
determining that there was independent legally sufficient evidence to establish guilt, so as not to bar retrial based on double jeopardy principles
rejecting Griffin on the basis that “the due process protection under the Hawai‘i constitution is not necessarily limited to that provided by the United States Constitution”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil, Blondin, Acoba

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

88 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.