New Mexico Supreme Court· 2/2/1994
Campos v. State
Citations
- 870 P.2d 117
- 117 N.M. 155
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Article II, Section 10, requires a warrantless arrest to be based on both probable cause and sufficient exigent circumstances
- holding that under the New Mexico Constitution, a warrantless arrest is invalid unless probable cause and exigent circumstances exist to support the arrest
- holding that Article II, Section 10, requires a warrantless arrest to be based on both probable cause and sufficient exigent circumstances
- according defendants more protection than would federal courts in the warrantless public arrests of felons
- declining to adopt the “blanket federal rule” that all warrantless arrests of felons where based on probable cause and in public places are constitutionally permissible
- declining to adopt the \blanket federal rule\ that all warrantless arrests of felons where based on probable cause and in public places are constitutionally permissible
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ransom, Montgomery, Frost
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1997-01-07· cited 466×
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2005-06-21· cited 182×
- State v. BreitNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1996-12-06· cited 153×
- State v. HodgeNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-08-23· cited 135×
- State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle BrownSupreme Court of Iowa· 2019-06-28· cited 135×
- State v. RyonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2005-03-03· cited 132×
- State v. NunezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1999-12-30· cited 115×
- State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2008-06-26· cited 114×
- State v. Cardenas-AlvarezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2001-04-30· cited 114×
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2009-09-01· cited 110×
- State v. SaizNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2008-07-22· cited 90×
- State v. KetelsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2011-05-20· cited 69×
- State v. PaananenNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2015-09-10· cited 65×
- State v. GranvilleNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-06-09· cited 59×
- State v. GranvilleNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-08-22· cited 52×
- State v. WagonerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2001-02-14· cited 51×
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-03-01· cited 50×
- State v. HernandezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-12-23· cited 47×
- State v. PattersonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-02-03· cited 46×
- State v. PonceNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-12-06· cited 38×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 2,263×
- State v. AttawayNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-02-02· cited 264×
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-10-27· cited 150×
- State v. CordovaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1989-12-20· cited 110×
- Greene v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-03-20· cited 74×
- State v. CopelandNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-08-19· cited 68×
- Capps v. New MexicoSupreme Court· 1982-06-28· cited 68×
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-06-02· cited 54×
- State v. DeltenreNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-09-06· cited 54×
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1980-06-02· cited 53×
- State v. CappsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-01-27· cited 37×
- State v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1981-01-26· cited 27×
- State v. KaiserNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-02-28· cited 26×
- Rodriquez v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 23×
- In Re One 1967 Peterbilt Tractor, Etc.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1973-03-02· cited 20×
- State v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1928-02-10· cited 17×
- State v. CamposNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-12-04· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.