Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2/26/1988
State v. Warren
Citations
- 419 N.W.2d 795
- 1988 Minn. LEXIS 85
- 1988 WL 13301
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the violation of a defendant’s right to counsel is a “pivotal constitutional right” that may justify a collateral attack on a prior conviction
- noting that collateral attack is available for a prior conviction where counsel was waived but no factual basis for the plea was placed on the record
- noting that collateral attack is available for a prior conviction where counsel was waived but no factual basis for the plea was placed on the record
- stating that the factual basis requirement “protects a defendant from pleading guilty to an offense more serious than defendant’s conduct warrants”
- facts of crime as observed by eyewitness set forth in detail in sworn complaint read twice into the record held sufficient factual basis
- State’s concession that no factual basis existed was premised on a misconception of the law and was not binding on appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelley, Popovich, Simonett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. McFeeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-09-21· cited 22×
- State v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-04-13· cited 19×
- United States v. LinngrenEighth Circuit· 2011-08-30· cited 13×
- State v. JoseyNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-04-23· cited 10×
- State v. CondonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1993-02-23· cited 9×
- State v. JurgensCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-05-03· cited 8×
- Vernlund v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-01-19· cited 8×
- State v. WilletteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-03-22· cited 7×
- State v. NodesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-12-20· cited 6×
- Bolinger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-06-18· cited 6×
- City of Rochester v. KottschadeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2017-06-07· cited 5×
- State v. FussySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-03-29· cited 4×
- State v. LangCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-12-06· cited 3×
- State v. KoubaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2006-02-07· cited 3×
- State v. OttoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-02-20· cited 3×
- State v. StromCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-11-01· cited 3×
- Munger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-08-28· cited 1×
- State v. FussyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-07-31· cited 1×
- David John Anderson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2016-05-09
- State of Iowa v. Merrill Lee HowardCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2016-07-27
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 4,326×
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-04-02· cited 3,200×
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 1,382×
- State v. TrottSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-09-16· cited 145×
- State v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-03-25· cited 80×
- State v. NeumannSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-01-20· cited 45×
- United States of America Ex Rel. Charles Terry v. Robert J. Henderson, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility, Auburn, New YorkSecond Circuit· 1972-06-13· cited 41×
- State v. HoaglundSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-03-05· cited 30×
- Camaj v. S. S. Kresge Co.Michigan Supreme Court· 1986-10-07· cited 23×
- State v. EdmisonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-12-27· cited 21×
- State v. MotlSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-08-19· cited 17×
- State v. GoffSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-01-22· cited 15×
- Pilger v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-09-02· cited 14×
- Beaman v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-09-13· cited 11×
- State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-01-15· cited 10×
- State v. SimonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-11-10· cited 7×
- State v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-06-16· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.