Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 8/6/1991
State v. Scott
Citations
- 473 N.W.2d 375
- 1991 Minn. App. LEXIS 788
- 1991 WL 145759
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that, in implied-consent case where police gave implied-consent advisory, individual had limited right to consult with attorney before submitting to chemical testing
- noting that ticket or tab charge, usually issued after test is pex*-formed, is equivalent to formal complaint
- noting that nonconsensual blood testing is permissible when police have probable cause suspect committed DWI and blood testing is necessary to preserve evidence
- noting that “the purpose of the implied consent advisory is to inform the driver of the serious consequences of his or her refusal”
- noting Aguirre line of cases, but relying on lack of any constitutional prohibition against nonconsensual blood testing
- suppressing blood test results taken involuntarily from driver who was given implied-consent advisory and refused test, but noting that results could have been used if trooper proceeded without implied-consent advisory
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wozniak, Norton, Schumacher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SchauerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1993-06-15· cited 9×
- State v. CondonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1993-02-23· cited 9×
- State v. AschnewitzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-04-14· cited 6×
- State v. NielsenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-04-11· cited 4×
- State v. AkersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-12-18· cited 3×
- State v. MikeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2018-08-27· cited 3×
- State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-06-17· cited 2×
- State v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2019-01-07· cited 2×
- State v. HunnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2017-06-19· cited 1×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 1,275×
- Raley v. OhioSupreme Court· 1959-06-22· cited 376×
- State v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-12-05· cited 143×
- McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-06-07· cited 103×
- Nyflot v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-06-11· cited 99×
- Tyler v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-05-24· cited 34×
- State v. AguirreSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-07-03· cited 32×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.