Skip to main content

State v. Scott

Citations

  • 473 N.W.2d 375
  • 1991 Minn. App. LEXIS 788
  • 1991 WL 145759

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, in implied-consent case where police gave implied-consent advisory, individual had limited right to consult with attorney before submitting to chemical testing
  • noting that ticket or tab charge, usually issued after test is pex*-formed, is equivalent to formal complaint
  • noting that nonconsensual blood testing is permissible when police have probable cause suspect committed DWI and blood testing is necessary to preserve evidence
  • noting that “the purpose of the implied consent advisory is to inform the driver of the serious consequences of his or her refusal”
  • noting Aguirre line of cases, but relying on lack of any constitutional prohibition against nonconsensual blood testing
  • suppressing blood test results taken involuntarily from driver who was given implied-consent advisory and refused test, but noting that results could have been used if trooper proceeded without implied-consent advisory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wozniak, Norton, Schumacher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.