Court of Appeals of Washington· 12/13/1993

State v. Condon

Citations

865 P.2d 521
72 Wash. App. 638
1993 Wash. App. LEXIS 497

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

ambiguous statement about defendant having been in jail was not so serious as to warrant a mistrial
testimony that defendant had been in jail less serious because it did not indicate defendant had been convicted
It is reasonable to infer that the weapon is located at the defendant’s residence “especially in eases where the perpetrator is unaware that police have connected him or her to the crime.”
ambiguous statement about defendant having been in jail did not to warrant a mistrial
witness testified defendant called her\when he was getting out of jail\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.