Washington Supreme Court· 6/7/2001

State v. Clark

Citations

143 Wash. 2d 731
24 P.3d 1006
2001 Wash. LEXIS 390

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“Failing to allow cross-examination of a state's witness under ER 608(b) is an abuse of discretion if the witness is crucial and the alleged misconduct constitutes the only available impeachment.”
considering whether defendant’s shackling upon entering the jury auditorium was unconstitutional
considering whether defendant's shackling upon entering the jury auditorium was unconstitutional
vehicle impounded to search for evidence of a rape and murder that occurred in the vehicle
“Clark’s shackling on the first day of voir dire was more than logically offset by over two weeks of observing Clark in the courtroom without shackles.”
“[W]here no balancing or analysis as to the need to restrain [the defendant] was done, his shackling was constitutional error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ireland, Sanders

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

106 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.