State v. York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that where the witness was the only witness of the alleged criminal conduct and the sought-after cross-examination was the only way to impeach that witness’s credibility, the trial court erred in limiting cross-examination
• undercover officer was the only witness to alleged drug sale and \his credibility was crucial to the State and to the defense\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Clark
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-06-07· cited 214×
• State v. Condon
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-12-13· cited 56×
• State v. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-04-18· cited 51×
• State v. O'CONNOR
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-09-15· cited 45×
• State v. Griswold
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-01-13· cited 33×
• State v. Dickenson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-06-22· cited 24×
• State v. McSorley
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-07-26· cited 15×
• Baxter v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-02-10· cited 13×
• State v. Barnes
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-06-20· cited 12×
• State v. Acosta
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-04-08· cited 9×
• State v. Martinez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-08-01· cited 9×
• State Of Washington v. Alan D. Jenks
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2020-03-03· cited 8×
• State v. Cirkovich
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-06-22· cited 6×
• State v. Olson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1981-09-28· cited 5×
• Harbottle v. Braun
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2019-08-27· cited 4×
• State of Washington v. Kevin Eugene Kelly
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2021-10-19· cited 4×