Court of Appeals of Oregon· 11/9/2011
State v. Young
Citations
- 266 P.3d 135
- 246 Or. App. 469
- 2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 1505
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We have held in several cases that a remand for correction of a sentenc- ing error after post-conviction relief does not allow the court 5 The legislature overhauled ORS chapter 138 in 2017. See State v. Colgrove, 370 Or 474, 484, 521 P3d 456 (2022
- “We have held in several cases that a remand for correction of a sentenc- ing error after post-conviction relief does not allow the court 5 The legislature overhauled ORS chapter 138 in 2017. See State v. Colgrove, 370 Or 474, 484, 521 P3d 456 (2022) (describing SB 896 (2017
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schuman, Wollheim, Nakamoto
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
- State v. TurnerOregon Supreme Court· 1967-06-21· cited 76×
- State v. PartainOregon Supreme Court· 2010-09-10· cited 26×
- State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-01-29· cited 10×
- State v. CoburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-03-05· cited 9×
- State v. CurryCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-11-01· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.