Supreme Court of Connecticut· 8/8/1995
State v. Cobb
Citations
- 234 Conn. 735
- 663 A.2d 948
- 1995 Conn. LEXIS 308
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- raising claim that “the death penalty scheme has been disproportionately applied to black defendants or to defendants whose victims were white”
- raising claim that \the death penalty scheme has been disproportionately applied to black defendants or to defendants whose victims were white\
- “[w]e will not infer that the legislature intended to enact a significant change in existing law without an unequivocally expressed manifestation of legislative intent” [internal quotation marks omitted]
- ‘‘the nature of the defendant’s claim of systemic racial bias, and the seriousness and finality of the death penalty, counsel against raising any undue procedural barriers to review of such a claim’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Borden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-06-03· cited 248×
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-12-28· cited 228×
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-07-30· cited 214×
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-12-07· cited 167×
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-06-01· cited 85×
- Gay & Lesbian Law Students Ass'n v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-03-26· cited 82×
- State v. BretonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-22· cited 81×
- State v. LoftinSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1999-02-01· cited 68×
- Doe v. DoeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-04-07· cited 64×
- State v. ClarkNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1999-07-08· cited 62×
- State v. SatchwellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-04-28· cited 57×
- State v. BretonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-06-24· cited 35×
- Epperson v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2006-02-23· cited 29×
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-01-14· cited 29×
- In Re Angeles Roca First Judicial District Philadelphia CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-11-22· cited 27×
- Jupiter Realty Co. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-08-12· cited 25×
- In Re Application for Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-01-27· cited 9×
- State v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2015-08-25
- State v. MaloneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2023-05-16
Cites
70 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court· 1983-06-28· cited 4,242×
- Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,080×
- McCleskey v. KempSupreme Court· 1987-06-08· cited 2,038×
- Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court· 1976-07-02· cited 2,034×
- Proffitt v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 1,798×
- California v. RamosSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 1,071×
- State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-03-05· cited 731×
- State v. HowellTennessee Supreme Court· 1993-11-10· cited 552×
- Turner v. MurraySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 533×
- Foster v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1994-04-28· cited 467×
- People v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court· 1989-12-07· cited 436×
- People v. BeanIllinois Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 332×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1994-05-23· cited 313×
- State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court· 1994-09-09· cited 277×
- Commonwealth v. FreySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-04-13· cited 262×
- In re Valerie D.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-08-18· cited 261×
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-26· cited 228×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.