New Mexico Supreme Court· 7/8/1999
State v. Clark
Citations
- 990 P.2d 793
- 128 N.M. 119
- 1999 NMSC 035
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a juror was properly struck because his religious beliefs prevented him from imposing the death penalty
- upholding exclusion of clergymen’s testimony regarding religious doctrine and opinions about the death penalty
- upholding exclusion of clergymen's testimony regarding religious doctrine and opinions about the death penalty
- “following a competency hearing or other evidence of competency, we believe that [the defendant] may knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive his right to further review of his case beyond this [c]ourt’s direct review of his sentence”
- personal beliefs and religious doctrine on morality of death penalty were “not relevant to [the defendant’s] character, record or circumstances of his offense”
- commuting the five death sentences
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Serna, Minzner, Baca, Maes, Franchini
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. AllenNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1999-12-01· cited 208×
- State v. CoffinNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1999-10-06· cited 171×
- State v. JacobsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2000-08-16· cited 170×
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-07-12· cited 166×
- State v. KleypasSupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-12-28· cited 144×
- State v. RizzoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-10-14· cited 127×
- Ware v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-09-14· cited 116×
- State v. LaneyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-10-14· cited 115×
- State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2010-03-23· cited 105×
- State v. FryNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2005-12-08· cited 103×
- State v. DruktenisNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-01-30· cited 100×
- Commonwealth v. MeansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-06-25· cited 99×
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-06-01· cited 85×
- United States v. SampsonD. Massachusetts· 2004-08-26· cited 76×
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2005-04-07· cited 65×
- State v. RizzoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-11-29· cited 62×
- State v. PadillaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2002-05-10· cited 47×
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-02-13· cited 37×
- Highler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2006-10-04· cited 34×
- Ajirogi v. StateHawaii Supreme Court· 1978-08-30· cited 31×
Cites
101 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 5,026×
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 4,818×
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 3,997×
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1940-05-20· cited 3,669×
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 3,458×
- State v. BlandTennessee Supreme Court· 1997-12-01· cited 3,458×
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 2,957×
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1976-07-02· cited 2,907×
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1990-04-24· cited 2,590×
- Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,080×
- McCleskey v. KempSupreme Court· 1987-06-08· cited 2,038×
- Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of HialeahSupreme Court· 1993-06-11· cited 1,769×
- Adams v. TexasSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 1,718×
- Lockhart v. McCreeSupreme Court· 1986-05-05· cited 1,649×
- Booth v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1987-09-21· cited 1,501×
- Simmons v. South CarolinaSupreme Court· 1994-06-17· cited 1,326×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.