Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1/14/2005
State v. Ross
Citations
- 863 A.2d 654
- 272 Conn. 577
- 2005 Conn. LEXIS 19
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Office of Chief Public Defender was classically aggrieved to bring writ of error challenging trial court’s denial of motion for permission to appear as next friend of party in interest
- applying “next friend” to post-conviction proceedings under common law
- applying “next friend” to post-conviction proceedings under common law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sullivan, Norcott, Vertefeuille, Zarella, Lavery, Foti, Dranginis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RizzoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-11-29· cited 62×
- Michael B. Ross, by His Next Friend, Donna Dunham v. Theresa Lantz, Commissioner of CorrectionsSecond Circuit· 2005-05-16· cited 21×
- Holton v. StateTennessee Supreme Court· 2006-06-22· cited 19×
- Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-05-19· cited 19×
- In Re Application for Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-01-25· cited 15×
- In Re Application for Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-01-27· cited 9×
- Missionary Society v. Board of Pardons & ParolesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-01-24· cited 6×
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-05-09· cited 6×
- Conn. Coal. for Justice in Educ. Funding, Inc. v. RellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2018-01-17· cited 4×
- State v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court· 2007-05-02· cited 3×
- Ross Ex Rel. Smyth v. LantzD. Connecticut· 2005-01-25· cited 3×
- Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v. R.W. Commerford & Sons, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2019-08-20· cited 3×
- State v. GiannoneConnecticut Appellate Court· 2024-09-17· cited 1×
- In re Criminal Complaint & Application for Arrest WarrantSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-10-03· cited 1×
- Daryl Keith Holton v. State of Tennessee and Paul Denis Reid, Jr. v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court· 2006-05-04
- Hinds v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2016-05-03
- State v. SkipwithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2017-08-15
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1990-04-24· cited 2,590×
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-03-01· cited 2,149×
- Ford v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 1,525×
- Rees v. PeytonSupreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 281×
- Demosthenes v. BaalSupreme Court· 1990-06-03· cited 266×
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-06-03· cited 248×
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-26· cited 228×
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-12-28· cited 228×
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-07-30· cited 214×
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-03-11· cited 204×
- Campfield v. Stickman, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at GreeneSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 186×
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-12-07· cited 167×
- State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-10-12· cited 157×
- Unisys Corp. v. Department of LaborSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-12-31· cited 129×
- State v. RizzoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-10-14· cited 127×
- Choice v. GoordSupreme Court· 2000-10-02· cited 119×
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-02-15· cited 95×
- State v. DoddWashington Supreme Court· 1992-10-08· cited 85×
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-06-01· cited 85×
- United States v. MichiganSixth Circuit· 1991-07-02· cited 82×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.