Illinois Supreme Court· 4/18/1990

People v. Bean

Citations

560 N.E.2d 258
137 Ill. 2d 65
147 Ill. Dec. 891
1990 Ill. LEXIS 43

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that defendant was not prejudiced by absence from in camera voir dire because he did not claim that the jurors selected were not impartial
holding that defendant was not prejudiced by absence from in camera voir dire because he did not claim that the jurors selected were not impartial
holding that a reviewing court may dispose of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim by applying either component of the Strickland analysis, and if it is not proved, need not consider the other component
holding that a reviewing court may dispose of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim by applying either component of the Strickland analysis, and if it is not proved, need not consider the other component
holding that no plain error occurred when a defendant’s presence from in camera voir dire was waived, as it had no effect on the impartiality of the jury
holding that a reviewing court may dispose of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim by applying either component of the Strickland analysis, and if it is not proved, need not consider the other component

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stamos, Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

180 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

89 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.