Skip to main content
Utah Supreme Court· 5/19/1989

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 774 P.2d 1141
  • 108 Utah Adv. Rep. 44
  • 1989 Utah LEXIS 45
  • 1989 WL 55372

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that claims must be based on distinct and specific objections in order to be preserved
  • explaining that jury instructions must be read and evaluated as a whole
  • explaining that jury instructions must be read and evaluated as a whole
  • arguing that a mere possibility may indeed establish a reasonable doubt
  • arguing that a mere possibility may indeed establish a reasonable doubt
  • requiring timely and specific objection to properly preserve issue for appellate review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Howe, Durham, Zimmerman, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.