Court of Appeals of Utah· 5/25/1994

State v. Ramos

Citations

882 P.2d 149
239 Utah Adv. Rep. 32
1994 Utah App. LEXIS 81
1994 WL 227041

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that when a defendant “elicited testimony regarding [a mug shot’s] existence when cross-examining [a detective],” he could not “on appeal attack the admission of the photograph because he himself opened the door to its introduction on cross-examination”
acknowledging that a defendant cannot attack on appeal the admission of other-acts evidence when “he himself opened the door to its introduction on cross-examination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Billings, Davis, Orme

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.