Washington Supreme Court· 6/9/1994

State v. Clark

Citations

875 P.2d 613
124 Wash. 2d 90
1994 Wash. LEXIS 332

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating \the Austin Court's reasoning for deeming forfeiture `punishment' for the purpose of Eighth Amendment analysis extends to the Fifth Amendment as well\
stating \the Austin Court’s reasoning for deeming forfeiture 'punishment' for the purpose of Eighth Amendment analysis extends to the Fifth Amendment as well\
determining forfeitures of the defendant’s homestead and motorhome were not excessive because their value nearly equaled the cost of prosecution and investigation
forfeiture of motor home under same statute \is `punishment' for purposes of federal double jeopardy analysis.\
\The Legislature ... ha[s] declared the Washington civil [ sic ] forfeiture statute to be at least partially punitive.\
dicta suggest similar federal and state statutes have similar implications for the purposes of federal double jeopardy, concluding both implicate jeopardy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Utter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.