Skip to main content
· 8/31/1998

In Re the Personal Restraint of Metcalf

Citations

  • 963 P.2d 911
  • 92 Wash. App. 165

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting State’s argument that a declaratory judgment action was an “adequate remedy” because counsel was not statutorily guaranteed in such an action
  • rejecting cruel punishment claim based on determination that deduction of incarcerated person’s wages to pay incarceration costs and victim compensation fund was remedial and not punishment for criminal conduct
  • citingHelveringv. Mitchell, 303 U.S. 391,401,58 S. Ct. 630, 82 L. Ed. 917 (1938)
  • “When a challenge is to a legislative enactment, the legislative process provides all the process due.”
  • Rooker-Feldman doctrine applies regardless of whether the state court judgment is on appeal
  • applying rational basis review to a prisoner’s interest in money

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.