People v. P.S.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating — while determining the parties presented neither reasons nor arguments for varying the double jeopardy analysis under the Illinois as opposed to the federal Constitution — that the defendants raised their constitutional arguments under both
• there is a double jeopardy violation only if all three questions are answered affirmatively

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Maury
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-03-11· cited 35×
• People v. P.S.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1997-01-30· cited 27×
• Department of Corrections Ex Rel. People v. Adams
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-04-23· cited 20×
• People v. Ratliff
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-07-26· cited 15×
• People v. Delatorre
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-05-23· cited 9×
• People Ex Rel. Neal v. Ryan
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-10-17· cited 8×
• People v. Eck
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-05-02· cited 6×
• People v. Lopeman
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-05-17· cited 3×
• In Re PS
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1997-01-30· cited 1×
• DeSeno v. Becker
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-07-07· cited 1×
• People v. Felix
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-07-26· cited 1×
• People v. Parmenter
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-09-20· cited 1×
• In Re PS
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1996-07-01
• Ludeman v. State, Dept. of Health
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-02-02
• People v. Daniels
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-09-25
• People v. One Single-Family Residence
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-04-03
• People v. Portuguez
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-06-26

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Blockburger v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
• North Carolina v. Pearce
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
• Teague v. Lane
  Supreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
• Missouri v. Hunter
  Supreme Court· 1983-01-19· cited 2,324×
• United States v. Dixon
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 2,221×
• United States v. Halper
  Supreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 1,945×
• Austin v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 1,908×
• Helvering v. Mitchell
  Supreme Court· 1938-03-07· cited 1,233×
• United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. Hess
  Supreme Court· 1943-01-18· cited 1,062×
• Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth Ranch
  Supreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 1,050×
• United States v. One Assortment of 89 Firearms
  Supreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 720×
• Harris v. Oklahoma
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-29· cited 618×
• Schiro v. Farley
  Supreme Court· 1994-01-19· cited 550×
• One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1972-12-11· cited 544×
• United States v. $405,089.23 U.S. Currency, Charles Arlt James Wren Payback Mines, Claimants-Appellants
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-09-06· cited 354×
• United States v. Renato Torres
  Seventh Circuit· 1994-07-11· cited 227×
• United States v. Jerry Wayne Tilley, and Susan Wells Tilley, Tommy Ross Anderson and Sarah Jane Anderson
  Fifth Circuit· 1994-05-11· cited 185×
• United States v. Guy Jerome Ursery
  Sixth Circuit· 1995-07-13· cited 168×
• People v. P.H.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1991-10-31· cited 166×
• People v. Levin
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1993-11-29· cited 116×