State v. Flagg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Vermont’s savings provision required application of reduced penalty as provided by new version of law when new law pre-dated offender’s sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Wade
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2002-10-23· cited 50×
• Holiday v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-07-30· cited 46×
• State v. Chrisman
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1994-02-23· cited 27×
• State v. Matthew S. Hinton
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2020-07-31· cited 5×
• State v. Clayton Turner
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2021-04-30· cited 5×
• Hearn v. Mark H. Wentworth Home for Chronic Invalids (In re Hearn)
  D. Vermont· 1994-11-16· cited 1×
• Munson Earth Moving Corp. v. City of South Burlington
  Vermont Superior Court· 2010-10-12
• State v. LeClair
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1997-08-01

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Estrada
  California Supreme Court· 1965-12-23· cited 2,432×
• People v. Oliver
  New York Court of Appeals· 1956-04-26· cited 172×
• People v. Behlog
  New York Court of Appeals· 1989-07-13· cited 108×
• Myott v. Myott
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-04-29· cited 79×
• United States v. Honorable Edwin L. Mechem, United States District Judge, District of New Mexico, and Frankie Chavez
  Tenth Circuit· 1975-01-13· cited 43×
• United States v. Blue Sea Line
  Fifth Circuit· 1977-06-06· cited 41×
• Bill Rapp Turner v. United States
  Fifth Circuit· 1969-04-28· cited 36×
• State v. Nichols
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1986-05-01· cited 12×