Supreme Court of South Carolina· 7/9/1976

State v. Chandler

Citations

226 S.E.2d 553
267 S.C. 138
1976 S.C. LEXIS 219

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that evidence seized at nighttime was properly admitted pursuant to warrant authorizing a search “in the daytime only” since the court determined the violation had no impact on the reliability or probative value of the evidence
stating that privacy rights, which prohibition against unreasonable searches are intended to protect, are not implicated by unauthorized nighttime search
holding evidence should not be suppressed when police searched defendant’s home at nighttime while defendant was in jail, despite the fact that the search warrant authorized a search in the daytime only, because violation was statutory in nature
“[E]xclusion of evidence should be limited to violations of constitutional rights and not to statutory violations .... ”
\[E]xclusion of evidence should be limited to violations of constitutional rights and not to statutory violations....\
“[Exclusion of evidence should be limited to violations of constitutional rights and not to statutory violations, at least where the [defendant] cannot demonstrate prejudice at trial resulting from the failure to follow statutory procedures.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ness, Lewis, Littlejohn, Rhodes, Gregory, JJ-

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.