Supreme Court of South Carolina· 3/13/1978

State v. Hammond

Citations

242 S.E.2d 411
270 S.C. 347
1978 S.C. LEXIS 529

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that the presence of marijuana in a truck on defendant's property was admissible as relevant to defendant's intent to distribute cocaine
finding that the presence of marijuana in a truck on defendant’s property was admissible as relevant to defendant’s intent to distribute cocaine
observing that “such a charge has no proper place in the judge’s statement of the law”
holding evidence of marijuana found in truck on defendant’s property was admissible as relevant to show intent to distribute cocaine
holding evidence of marijuana found in truck on defendant's property was admissible as relevant to show intent to distribute cocaine
holding that although it is always proper for an attorney in his argument to the jury to point out the failure of a party to call a material witness, “such a charge has no proper place in the judge’s statement of the law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Littlejohn, Lewis, Ness, Rhodes, Gregory

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.