Supreme Court of South Carolina· 4/5/2010
Hutto v. State
Citations
- 692 S.E.2d 196
- 387 S.C. 244
- 2010 S.C. LEXIS 98
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating the exclusion of evidence should be limited to violations of constitutional rights and not to statutory violations
- “No prejudice occurs, despite deficient performance, when there is overwhelming evidence of guilt.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Waller, Kittredge, Moore, Pleicones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-12-04· cited 215×
- Butler v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-08-27· cited 103×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-01-27· cited 82×
- McKnight v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-05-12· cited 43×
- Rosemond v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-06-29· cited 25×
- State v. ChandlerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-07-09· cited 24×
- State v. HookSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-11-24· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.