Supreme Court of South Carolina· 10/28/1970
State v. Jordan
Citations
- 177 S.E.2d 464
- 255 S.C. 86
- 1970 S.C. LEXIS 165
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that in reviewing denial of directed verdict motion, issues not raised to trial court in support of directed verdict motion are not preserved for appellate review
- noting our supreme court has, in numerous cases, held that [an appellate court] will not consider a question on appeal which was not presented in the court below.
- refusing to consider an appellate argument that was asserted to show the trial court erred in denying his directed verdict motion when the argument was not raised as a ground for the motion at trial
- “This court has, in numerous cases, held that it will not consider a question on appeal which was not presented in the court below.”
- “[Fraudulent intent is a condition of the mind beyond the reach of the senses, usually kept secret and can only be proved by unguarded expressions, conduct and circumstances generally.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moss, Lewis, Bussey, Brailsford, Littlejohn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. KennerlyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-06-15· cited 58×
- State v. TucknessSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-12-14· cited 45×
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-08-07· cited 41×
- State v. HudsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-11-24· cited 34×
- State v. HammondSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-03-13· cited 32×
- State v. HollandSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1973-11-28· cited 32×
- State v. ChandlerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-07-09· cited 24×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-03-10· cited 24×
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-06-15· cited 22×
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-02-17· cited 19×
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-02-11· cited 19×
- State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-11-10· cited 17×
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1972-10-02· cited 16×
- State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-01-28· cited 16×
- State v. WheelerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1972-12-11· cited 15×
- State v. AlbertSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-11-03· cited 12×
- State v. AddisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1972-01-20· cited 11×
- State v. CoxSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1972-03-07· cited 9×
- State v. ParrisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-03-10· cited 9×
- State v. PaceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-10-11· cited 8×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. WellsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1967-03-28· cited 24×
- State v. HyderSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1963-05-14· cited 22×
- State v. RayfieldSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1958-01-07· cited 16×
- State v. PearsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1953-05-13· cited 8×
- Roddey v. ErwinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1889-04-15· cited 5×
- Younger v. MasseySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1893-04-18· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.