Skip to main content

State v. Carver

Citations

  • 678 P.2d 842
  • 37 Wash. App. 122
  • 1984 Wash. App. LEXIS 2744

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • one purpose of the rape shield statute is to “eliminate prejudicial evidence of prior sexual conduct of a victim”
  • evidence of past sexual abuse of minors should have been admitted to rebut the inference that they would not know about such sexual acts unless they had experienced them with defendant
  • evidence of past sexual abuse of minors should have been admitted to rebut the inference that they would not know about such sexual acts unless they had experienced them with defendant
  • \The State need not fix a precise time for the commission of the offense when it cannot intelligently do so.\
  • rape shield did not apply where “the evidence sought to be admitted here was prior sexual abuse, not misconduct, of a victim”
  • evidence that child victims were victims of prior sexual abuse was “extremely relevant to defendant’s defense, and its exclusion unfairly curtailed defendant’s ability to present a logical explanation for the victims’ testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reed, Petrich, Worswick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.