Court of Appeals of Washington· 3/19/1984
State v. Carver
Citations
- 678 P.2d 842
- 37 Wash. App. 122
- 1984 Wash. App. LEXIS 2744
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- one purpose of the rape shield statute is to “eliminate prejudicial evidence of prior sexual conduct of a victim”
- evidence of past sexual abuse of minors should have been admitted to rebut the inference that they would not know about such sexual acts unless they had experienced them with defendant
- evidence of past sexual abuse of minors should have been admitted to rebut the inference that they would not know about such sexual acts unless they had experienced them with defendant
- \The State need not fix a precise time for the commission of the offense when it cannot intelligently do so.\
- rape shield did not apply where “the evidence sought to be admitted here was prior sexual abuse, not misconduct, of a victim”
- evidence that child victims were victims of prior sexual abuse was “extremely relevant to defendant’s defense, and its exclusion unfairly curtailed defendant’s ability to present a logical explanation for the victims’ testimony”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reed, Petrich, Worswick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Clinton K. Lajoie v. S. Frank Thompson, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, No. 98-35919Ninth Circuit· 2000-06-23· cited 87×
- State v. OliverArizona Supreme Court· 1988-08-04· cited 79×
- People v. AldrichColorado Court of Appeals· 1992-08-13· cited 58×
- Commonwealth v. RuffenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1987-05-12· cited 56×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa· 1992-07-22· cited 52×
- State v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-05-12· cited 50×
- State v. KilgoreCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-07-10· cited 44×
- State v. JacquesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1989-05-26· cited 41×
- State v. PoseyWashington Supreme Court· 2007-09-20· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-10-16· cited 34×
- State v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-05-20· cited 31×
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-11-18· cited 30×
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-07-08· cited 30×
- State v. DickensonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-06-22· cited 24×
- State v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-04-04· cited 23×
- State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1988-07-20· cited 22×
- Woodruff v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1988-01-13· cited 19×
- State v. LaveryCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1993-08-13· cited 14×
- State v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-01-26· cited 13×
- State v. GrovensteinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-04-24· cited 9×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. HudlowWashington Supreme Court· 1983-02-24· cited 308×
- State v. ArndtWashington Supreme Court· 1976-08-05· cited 245×
- State v. SaltarelliWashington Supreme Court· 1982-12-16· cited 227×
- State v. GolladayWashington Supreme Court· 1970-05-28· cited 154×
- State v. FergusonWashington Supreme Court· 1983-07-28· cited 101×
- State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court· 1953-08-05· cited 78×
- State v. CosdenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1977-07-20· cited 40×
- State v. GeerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1975-03-26· cited 40×
- State v. SimmonsWashington Supreme Court· 1962-01-12· cited 37×
- State v. LeohnerWashington Supreme Court· 1966-08-11· cited 24×
- State v. PittsWashington Supreme Court· 1963-06-06· cited 17×
- State v. LongCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-05-01· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.