Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 10/16/1989
Commonwealth v. Johnson
Citations
- 566 A.2d 1197
- 389 Pa. Super. 184
- 1989 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3038
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reaffirming the principle that evidence of the potential bias of the witness which, because of the logical nexus between the prior sexual activity and the testimony to be presented, would be exculpatory of a defendant, implicates the defendant’s right of confrontation and must be admitted
- reaffirming the principle that evidence of the potential bias of the witness which, because of the logical nexus between the prior sexual activity and the testimony to be presented, would be exculpatory of a defendant, implicates the defendant's right of confrontation and must be admitted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cirillo, Brosky, Rowley, McEwen, Olszewski, Tamilia, Popovich, Johnson, Melinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-03-07· cited 92×
- Commonwealth v. WallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-02-26· cited 51×
- Commonwealth v. BoylesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-07-29· cited 41×
- Commonwealth v. NievesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-09-26· cited 39×
- Commonwealth v. GaddisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-03-22· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. K.S.F.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-10-08· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. EckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-03-30· cited 35×
- Grant v. DemskieS.D. New York· 1999-11-17· cited 21×
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-11-27· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. BerkowitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-09-22· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. AppenzellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-10-16· cited 16×
- People v. ParksMichigan Supreme Court· 2009-06-05· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. ReeferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-05-01· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. SandersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-11-25· cited 4×
- Commonwealth v. RuggianoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-12-13· cited 2×
- Com. v. K.S.F.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-10-08
- Commonwealth v. CanfieldLehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 1992-10-30
- Commonwealth v. MalaveBerks County Court of Common Pleas· 1994-08-12
- Commonwealth v. BattistaDelaware County Court of Common Pleas· 1995-04-19
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Commonwealth v. DurstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-05-30· cited 206×
- Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-03-26· cited 180×
- Clinebell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1988-04-22· cited 143×
- Commonwealth v. BlackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-11· cited 102×
- Miller v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1989-09-06· cited 100×
- Commonwealth v. CargoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-04-23· cited 84×
- Commonwealth v. MajoranaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-23· cited 70×
- State v. CarverCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-03-19· cited 60×
- Commonwealth v. ReynoldsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-07-12· cited 59×
- Commonwealth v. LeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-12-29· cited 58×
- Commonwealth v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-04-20· cited 51×
- Commonwealth v. HaightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-05-22· cited 39×
- Commonwealth v. TroySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-01-13· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. HaightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-09-07· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. CoiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-05-17· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. KestingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-12-28· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-07-28· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.