Washington Supreme Court· 6/6/1963
State v. Pitts
Citations
- 382 P.2d 508
- 62 Wash. 2d 294
- 1963 Wash. LEXIS 330
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant should not escape his transgressions merely because the time of commission cannot be fixed in precise terms
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dawson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BartholomewWashington Supreme Court· 1982-11-24· cited 111×
- State v. CarverCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-03-19· cited 60×
- Caldwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1976-07-09· cited 41×
- State v. HayeWashington Supreme Court· 1967-11-09· cited 26×
- Bentley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1965-01-08· cited 24×
- State v. BrooksWashington Supreme Court· 2020-01-23· cited 21×
- State v. RhinehartWashington Supreme Court· 1967-03-02· cited 20×
- State v. DickensWashington Supreme Court· 1965-04-15· cited 17×
- State v. CalhounCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1975-06-09· cited 11×
- Dearing v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1984-12-06· cited 9×
- State v. PendletonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1973-03-26· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.