Skip to main content

State v. Carter

Citations

  • 415 A.2d 185
  • 138 Vt. 264
  • 1980 Vt. LEXIS 1197

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • accomplice liability may be established by inference that presence at scene of crime was by common design
  • accomplice liability may be established by inference that presence at scene of crime was by common design
  • accomplice liability requires that defendant “knowingly and intentionally participated to some substantial measure in ... a common criminal objective.” (internal quotations omitted)
  • where no evidence that prior to sale defendant procured, incited or encouraged an item’s theft, presence or acquiescence not enough to uphold aiding and abetting conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barney, C. J., Daley, Billings and Hill, Jj., and Costes, District Judge, Specially Assigned

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.