Supreme Court of Vermont· 4/3/1979
State v. Bushey
Citations
- 400 A.2d 993
- 137 Vt. 155
- 1979 Vt. LEXIS 957
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- expressions “common understanding” and “common purpose” sufficiently indicate necessary concurrence of intent, purpose and object of activity to inform jury that element of intent must be common to all accomplices
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barney, C. J., and Daley, Larrow, Billings and Hill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BallouSupreme Court of Vermont· 1968-02-06· cited 29×
- State v. MecierSupreme Court of Vermont· 1967-02-07· cited 19×
- State v. BourassaSupreme Court of Vermont· 1979-02-06· cited 18×
- Langevin v. GilmanSupreme Court of Vermont· 1960-03-02· cited 16×
- State v. SearsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1972-10-03· cited 14×
- State v. BenoitSupreme Court of Vermont· 1978-09-11· cited 12×
- State v. BruceSupreme Court of Vermont· 1967-06-06· cited 11×
- State v. GignacSupreme Court of Vermont· 1957-02-05· cited 7×
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont· 1954-01-05· cited 7×
- State v. StoneSupreme Court of Vermont· 1964-06-02· cited 6×
- State v. HotteSupreme Court of Vermont· 1971-04-06· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.