Skip to main content

State v. Morrill

Citations

  • 253 A.2d 142
  • 127 Vt. 506
  • 1969 Vt. LEXIS 265

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding exclusion of questioning on cross-examination proper when defendant failed to make a showing of abuse of discretion by trial court or prejudice
  • “There can be no question in this state but that in a criminal case the jury, under proper guidance and direction of the court, makes the ultimate decision on the issues of fact presented to it.”
  • defendant must demonstrate harm or prejudice in order to produce a reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holden, Shangraw, Barney, Keyser, Larrow, Supr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.