Skip to main content

State v. Carter

Citations

  • 904 P.2d 290

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding where defendant testified fully at trial regarding privacy issues there was no need for remand under Combs
  • holding where defendant testified fully at trial regarding privacy issues there was no need for remand under Combs
  • disagreeing with Division One's abandonment of the automatic standing doctrine
  • disagreeing with Division One’s abandonment of the automatic standing doctrine
  • stating Washington’s automatic standing rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.