Supreme Court of Connecticut· 9/8/1998
State v. Cardwell
Citations
- 246 Conn. 721
- 38 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1158
- 718 A.2d 954
- 1998 Conn. LEXIS 338
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no territorial jurisdiction to prosecute defendant for ticket scalping because he did not sell tickets to Connecticut events in Connecticut
- the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act “vest[s] the trial court with discretion to award relief and impose penalties as it deems appropriate under the circumstances of each case.”
- territorial jurisdiction ‘‘limits the state’s interest in vindicating its criminal statutes to within the Page 16 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL October 8, 2024 796 OCTOBER, 2024 349 Conn. 783 State v. Honsch See, e.g., State v. Cardwell, 246 Conn. 721, 739, 718 A.2d 954 (1998
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berdon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Carvajal v. ArtusSecond Circuit· 2011-01-25· cited 144×
- State v. VelascoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-05-16· cited 89×
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-06-15· cited 86×
- Tobin Mueller v. Rick RaemischSeventh Circuit· 2014-01-24· cited 55×
- Cogswell v. American Transit InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-05-22· cited 47×
- State v. John F.M.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-02-19· cited 13×
- State v. HonschSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-07-19· cited 13×
- Abel v. PLANNING & ZON. COM'N OF NEW CANAANSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-07-13· cited 7×
- State v. CourchesneConnecticut Superior Court· 1999-05-19· cited 4×
- Phelan Ex Rel. Estate of Phelan v. Daimler Chrysler Corp.D. Connecticut· 2004-06-28· cited 3×
- State of West Virginia, Ex rel 3M Company v. Jay Hoke and Patrick MorriseyWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2020-11-23
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-26· cited 228×
- Conway v. Town of WiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-08-06· cited 154×
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-06-25· cited 112×
- State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-05-06· cited 102×
- Gelinas v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-05-25· cited 87×
- State v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-04-15· cited 61×
- Europe & Overseas Commodity Traders, S.A. v. Banque Paribas LondonSecond Circuit· 1998-06-04· cited 56×
- Jenkins v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-01-27· cited 42×
- State v. PiegerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-04-29· cited 32×
- State Board of Labor Relations v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-04-14· cited 29×
- People v. Concert Connection, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1995-05-22· cited 24×
- Crandall v. GouldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-04-28· cited 21×
- State v. RussellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-04-09· cited 19×
- Fred P. KREIS, Jr., Appellant, v. MATES INVESTMENT FUND, INC., and Frederick S. Mates, AppelleesEighth Circuit· 1973-02-16· cited 17×
- State v. PayneConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-12-26· cited 17×
- L. S. ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CUPPLES CONTAINER CO. Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesNinth Circuit· 1975-03-25· cited 16×
- Lane v. HopfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1970-11-18· cited 15×
- Danville Silk Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-11-11· cited 6×
- Ninth Street East, Ltd. v. HarrisonConnecticut Appellate Court· 1968-12-23· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.