· 6/28/2004
Phelan Ex Rel. Estate of Phelan v. Daimler Chrysler Corp.
Citations
- 323 F. Supp. 2d 335
- 53 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 821
- 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12275
- 2004 WL 1490253
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding a plaintiff’s CUTPA claim time-barred at the summary judgment, rather than motion to dismiss, stage
- continuing course of conduct doctrine did not apply in the absence of such a repeated and direct interaction between the parties
- “July 9 is the end point of any possible deceptive act by DCC related to inducing purchase of the jeep by Phelan’s decedent and, as such, the final date of a CUTPA violation from which the statute of limitations begins to run.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arterton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.