Skip to main content
· 6/28/2004

Phelan Ex Rel. Estate of Phelan v. Daimler Chrysler Corp.

Citations

  • 323 F. Supp. 2d 335
  • 53 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 821
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12275
  • 2004 WL 1490253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding a plaintiff’s CUTPA claim time-barred at the summary judgment, rather than motion to dismiss, stage
  • continuing course of conduct doctrine did not apply in the absence of such a repeated and direct interaction between the parties
  • “July 9 is the end point of any possible deceptive act by DCC related to inducing purchase of the jeep by Phelan’s decedent and, as such, the final date of a CUTPA violation from which the statute of limitations begins to run.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arterton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.