Skip to main content

State v. Card

Citations

  • 741 P.2d 65
  • 48 Wash. App. 781

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting RAP 2.5(a) allow courts discretion to consider issues for the first time on appeal \when fundamental justice so requires\
  • court addresses State’s argument, raised for the first time on appeal, based on notion of “fundamental justice”
  • court addresses State's argument, raised for the first time on appeal, based on notion of \fundamental justice\
  • State can satisfy initial burden by proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the property at issue is stolen
  • applicability of a court rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McInturff, Green, Munson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.