State v. Munoz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that appellant’s due process challenge to jurors questioning of witnesses was not preserved

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Fisher
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2003-06-11· cited 213×
• Commonwealth v. Britto
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2001-03-30· cited 80×
• State v. Culkin
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2001-12-06· cited 66×
• State v. Hays
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1994-10-28· cited 50×
• Medina v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2005-06-27· cited 38×
• State v. Doleszny
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2004-01-30· cited 21×
• State v. Terry
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-06-19· cited 13×
• Handy v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-10-26· cited 12×
• State of Washington v. Edward W. Terry
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-06-19
• State v. Munoz
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-07-27

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Lord
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-02-07· cited 447×
• Bennett v. Hardy
  Washington Supreme Court· 1990-01-18· cited 271×
• DeBenedetto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
  Fourth Circuit· 1985-01-16· cited 86×
• State v. Card
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-08-06· cited 70×
• State v. Zima
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1991-04-25· cited 68×
• United States v. Alvin E. Johnson
  Eighth Circuit· 1990-02-09· cited 49×
• People v. McAlister
  California Court of Appeal· 1985-04-30· cited 43×
• State v. Williamson
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1981-06-16· cited 28×
• State v. Monroe
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-04-20· cited 6×