Nebraska Supreme Court· 6/21/2019
State v. Ebert
Citations
- 303 Neb. 394
- 929 N.W.2d 478
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- presump- tive right to possession of seized property may be overcome when superior title in another is shown by preponderance of evidence
- “[m]ore probable than not” is generally preponderance of evidence standard
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cassel, Funke, Heavican, Lerman, Miller, Papik, Stacy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ZimmerNebraska Supreme Court· 2022-04-01· cited 4×
- State v. RileyNebraska Court of Appeals· 2022-08-23· cited 2×
- Huff v. OttoNebraska Court of Appeals· 2020-07-21· cited 1×
- State v. BixbyNebraska Supreme Court· 2023-12-08· cited 1×
- State v. AllenNebraska Supreme Court· 2025-03-21· cited 1×
- State v. EbertNebraska Supreme Court· 2019-06-21
- State v. HuffNebraska Court of Appeals· 2020-05-12
- State v. HarrisNebraska Court of Appeals· 2022-10-04
- State v. McKinneyNebraska Supreme Court· 2026-04-10
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. McGuireNebraska Supreme Court· 2018-12-14· cited 358×
- State v. AgeeNebraska Supreme Court· 2007-11-09· cited 93×
- State v. CardCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-08-06· cited 70×
- DeLoge v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2007-04-27· cited 64×
- State v. BainNebraska Supreme Court· 2016-01-08· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.