Skip to main content
· 4/8/1981

Batten v. Abrams

Citations

  • 626 P.2d 984
  • 28 Wash. App. 737

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing a pattern in multiple cases from various jurisdictions that “regularity or irregularity of the initial process is irrelevant”
  • \[T]here must be an act after filing suit using legal process empowered by that suit to accomplish an end not within the purview of the suit.\
  • nonlawyer who undertakes role of lawyer \assumes the duties and responsibilities [of a lawyer] and is accountable to the same standards of ethics and legal knowledge.\
  • nonlawyer who undertakes role of lawyer “assumes the duties and responsibilities [of a lawyer] and is accountable to the same standards of ethics and legal knowledge.”
  • “[Tjhere must be an act after filing suit using legal process empowered by that suit to accomplish an end not within the purview of the suit.”
  • parties failed to comply with mandatory local court rule, leaving trial court unable to impose discovery sanctions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edgerton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.