Skip to main content
· 4/2/1992

State v. Alaway

Citations

  • 828 P.2d 591
  • 64 Wash. App. 796
  • 1992 Wash. App. LEXIS 118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, since colonial times, forfeiture in this country has existed only by statute
  • \one claiming an interest\ in property subject to forfeiture has 45 days to respond after being notified
  • “In Washington, CrR 2.3(e) governs motions for the return of illegally seized property and also motions for the return of lawfully seized property no longer needed for evidence.” (footnote omitted)
  • tools, building materials, and gardening supplies used to grow marijuana not contraband

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morgan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.